|
|
|
| Documents with links to: The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science, Thomas E. Levy, Thomas ... ... https://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-bible-and-radiocarbon-dating-archaeology-text-and-science-thomas-e-levy-thomas-higham-2005ad.htm |
| 1: | Solomon's network of military border fortresses in the Negev
Biblical and archeological point of view. It is clear that Pharaoh Shishak destroyed the fortresses in 924 BC. We even have his account etched into the stone at Temple of Amon in Karnak. (see below) Since we know that the fortresses had a short occupation life, this fits perfectly with Solomon as the builder just 26 years earlier. The opinion on the builder and dates of these fortresses varies depending on the bias of the archeologist and fall into two categories: Those who believe the Bible and those who do not. Basically, those archeologists who believe the Bible attribute these 50 fortresses to Solomon in 950 BC. Those archeologists who say Solomon and David are mostly a myth, will attribute dates before or after David/Solomon, but fight hard to avoid any suggestion that confirms the historicity of David/Solomon as revealed in the Bible. Sure these Bible trashing archeologists believe David and Solomon were real people, just that most of what the Bible says is untrue. They have a ... ... ...https://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-exodus-kadesh-barnea-davids-negev-border-fortress-network.htm | Size: 75K Depth: 2 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
| 2: | They are digging up Bible stories! Start Page They are digging up Bible stories! Our approach at this archeology website: We take the Bible as the inerrant, inspired word of our creator. It is the only 100 % accurate record of history and the key to unlocking all archeological mysteries. We accept the witness of history, but history was rejected when it contradicted the Bible. We accept the witness of genuine and valid science of archeology. We support archeology and archeologists. However when the personal opinions of archeologists conflict with the Bible, we reject archeology. For example, most archeologists do not believe man learned to farm or herd domesticated flocks of sheep until about 1000 BC, yet the Bible says that the children of Adam and Eve did both. Cain was a farmer of grain and Able was a shepherd of sheep. "Abel was a keeper of flocks, but Cain was a tiller of the ground." (Gen 4:2) Enoch, the son of Cain, built a city! (Gen 4:17) This notion that there was a time when man was so primitive he was merely a "hunter ... ... ...https://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-start-here.htm | Size: 28K Depth: 4 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
| 3: | Ein El-Qudeirat is not Kadesh Barnea: : Wrongly identified as ... ...Has the site been correctly identified? If so, why have we found no remains from the Exodus period? ... Thus far our excavations have yielded nothing earlier than the tenth century B.C. - the time of King Solomon." (Rudolph Cohen) See also: Chronological History of "The search for Kadesh" Click to View Click to View Ein El-Qudeirat: the largest oasis in the Sinai but certainly cannot be Kadesh Barnea Introduction document: Solomon's network of military border fortresses Click to View Qudeirat Click to View Qedeis Click to View Quseima Click to View Nahas Click to View K. Ajrud Click to View Elat/Kheleifeh Click to View Haseva Click to View Loz Introduction: Ein El-Qudeirat means "Fountain of Omnipotence" or "Fountain of God s Power" If you want to take the easy short cut and skip all the reasons from the Bible, history and archeology why Qudeirat cannot be Kadesh, Click here to learn the true location of Kadesh Barnea now. For an detailed summary of the search for Kadesh Barnea see ... ... ...https://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-exodus-kadesh-barnea-fortresses-ein-el-qudeirat.htm | Size: 123K Depth: 2 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
| 4: | The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science ... ...The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating, Thomas E. Levy, Thomas Higham, A.J. Shortland, 2005) 18 THE BIBLE AND RADIOCARBON DATING During the 1970s and 1980s, there was almost a consensus concerning the dating of two main pottery assemblages that are of interest to us here: a. The late Iron Age I assemblage, represented by the pottery from the destruction layers of Megiddo VIA, Tell Qasile X, Tel Masos II, and parallel strata at other sites, was dated to the late 11th or early 10th century BCE. b. The Iron IIA assemblage, with northern and southern variants, represented by the destruction layers of Megiddo VA-IVB, Taanach Period IIB, Yokneam XIV, Beth Shean S-1 (in the Hebrew University excavations), Lachish V, Arad XII, and parallel strata at other sites, was dated by most scholars to the 10th century, until Shishak's raid. The deconstruction of the Albright/Yadin `Solomonic paradigm' began during the 1970s with Benno Rothenberg's and later by Gary Pratico's demolition of Nelson Glueck's ... ... ...https://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-bible-and-radiocarbon-dating-archaeology-text-and-science-thomas-e-levy-thomas-higham-2005ad.htm | Size: 126K Depth: 5 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
| 5: | Khirbat en-Nahas Fortress: Part of Solomon's network of military ... This is the largest copper mine in the entire Arabah valley. The true to colour image above shows the piles of black copper slag stacked all around the site. Introduction document: Solomon's network of military border fortresses Click to View Qudeirat Click to View Qedeis Click to View Quseima Click to View Nahas Click to View K. Ajrud Click to View Elat/Kheleifeh Click to View Haseva Click to View Loz Click to View Introduction: Khirbat en-Nahas (KEN) is a fortress built by Solomon and the Edomites probably had nothing to do with it. The pre-occupation level under the fortress, is more likely Moabite or Amorite. Click to View KEN is larger than Timna. "The excavations at Khirbat en-Nahas, the largest Iron Age copper production centre in the southern Levant" (Reassessing the chronology of Biblical Edom, Thomas E. Levy, 2004 AD) Learn more about: Timna. Click to View Apart from the obvious shortcomings of Radiocarbon dating, we feel the work of Thomas Levy's team is excellent. For an ... ... ...https://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-exodus-kadesh-barnea-fortresses-khirbat-en-nahas.htm | Size: 34K Depth: 5 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
| 6: | Pottery of the Bible lands Trademark pottery manufactured at Qurayyah in Arabia and brought to Israel through the Kenites. Click to View Negev Pottery "Disposable dish ware" Crude, handmade pottery 1446 - 700 BC of the Negev. Click to View Cypriot pottery From the Island of Cypress, this pottery was key to proving the location of Jericho. Click to View A. Radiocarbon Analysis of Pottery at Khirbat en-Nahas: See our page on Khirbat en-Nahas. "Initial observations on the pottery corpus suggest that much of the pottery should be taken as very early Iron Age II, and dated to the tenth-to-ninth centuries, although there are slight indications that some of the material may be earlier and dated to the Iron Age I, of the twelfth -to-eleventh centuries. Collared-rim jars, large jugs, carinated bowls and monochrome and bichrome ring-painted bowls dominate the local assemblage. Included in the local assemblage are a large number of hand-made bowls and holemouth jars that have often been referred to in other reports as ... ... https://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-pottery.htm | Size: 9K Depth: 5 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
| This display shows the pages which are the "parents" or "above" this document. It can help you navigate upwards when there are no go-back links on the page. |
