Lessons From Thirty Pieces Of Silver
It had been the potter’s field, full of clay and probably not very good for
farming. But another use was found for it – it became a place to bury
strangers. Poor, non-local Jews who died while in Jerusalem could be interred
in this field bought from the potter and made into a cemetery. It may have
been the potter’s field in the past, but it became known as the “Field of
Blood” because it had been purchased with “blood money” (see Matthew 27:3-10).
Judas, one of the twelve, had conspired with the chief priests to deliver
Jesus to them and had received thirty pieces of silver for his perfidy
(Matthew 26:3-5, 14-16). John’s gospel informs us that Judas was the disciple
who carried the “money box” containing the common funds of Jesus’ disciples
during His public ministry (12:6; see also 13:29). He was also a thief and
stole from these funds. He was a greedy man who apparently thought he could
profit monetarily from the hatred of the chief priests for Jesus.
It was Judas’ thirty pieces of silver which were used to purchase the potter’s
field. Since the money had been paid to Judas as recompense for delivering
Jesus to those who would eventually condemn Him to death, it was “blood
money.” The story of how this purchase occurred is instructional.
The motivation of Judas in betraying his Master is identified only implicitly.
In Mark’s gospel, we are told that the chief priests and scribes were plotting
how they could take Jesus by trickery and put Him to death, but the problem
with doing so was the multitudes that followed Jesus (14:1-2). It is likely no
accident that Mark next records the anointing of Jesus with oil in a home in
Bethany and the criticism of some of the disciples, including Judas (14:3-9).
Mark then notes that Judas went to the chief priests and offered to betray
Jesus to them. In the story of the anointing of Jesus, sandwiched between the
plotting of the Jewish leaders to take Jesus by trickery and Judas’ offer to
betray his Master, Mark suggested a possible motivation of Judas to betray
Matthew tells us that Judas brought the thirty pieces of silver back to the
chief priests and elders (27:3). It would appear that these Jewish leaders had
returned to the temple, after having delivered Jesus to Pontius Pilate and
been assured of His destruction at the hands of the Romans (see 27:20). Since
the trial of Jesus before Pilate is recorded in the remainder of Matthew 27,
it is likely that the story of Judas returning the “blood money” is not in
strict chronological order.
Judas was filled with regret that he had betrayed Jesus. He knew that Jesus
had already been condemned by Pilate (Matthew 27:3), but I suspect that he was
surprised that this had happened. As one of the twelve, Judas had seen Jesus
do many miracles and also escape the murderous designs of His enemies on more
than one occasion. He probably had reasoned that Jesus would escape harm as He
had done in the past and he (Judas) might as well put some cash into his
pocket from the whole affair.
Note that Judas confessed two things: the innocence of Jesus and his sin in
betraying Him (27:4). Stricken with remorse because of his evil deed, the
money he had so eagerly coveted was burning a hole in his hand. He wanted
nothing more than to return the money as though his guilt could be erased by
doing so. His fellow conspirators, however, offered him no comfort; they cared
nothing for the sudden resurgence of his conscience. “What is that to us? You
see to it!”
Judas threw the pieces of silver into the temple (the Holy Place?) and left.
After he left, the chief priests collected the coins and decided among
themselves that it just wouldn’t be “right” to put them into the temple
treasury since they represented the price of blood (27:6). They used the money
instead to purchase the potter’s field which came to be known as the “Field of
Blood” because of the circumstances of its purchase.
“What Were You Thinking?!”
The thirty pieces of silver must have looked so appealing to Judas before the
betrayal, but he eventually realized that their worth was nothing compared to
the cost of obtaining them. So many baubles of the world are like that; to
covetous eyes they sparkle and shine…and men and women give up things of much
greater worth to obtain them. Those same men and women often realize later,
even as Judas did, the great cost they have incurred for such temporary
Even though Judas brought the money back, he couldn’t undo the treachery he
had committed. Even if the chief priests and elders had been willing to take
the money back, the deed had been done and Jesus had been arrested, abused and
condemned to death. Giving up the reward for evil wouldn’t take away the guilt
for sin committed. What a hard lesson to learn! Many people would love the
opportunity to “undo” the terrible things they have done, but it is not
possible. We must learn about the bitter aftertaste of the fruit of wickedness
from the things “written for our learning” (Romans 15:4).
Although we cannot remove the guilt of our sins by ourselves, fortunately we
CAN be forgiven. If only Judas had waited for three days! Perhaps he would
then have seen the victory of the resurrection…as Peter did. Instead, Judas
committed suicide by hanging himself.
Of Gnats and Camels
The behavior of the chief priests and elders on this occasion qualifies as a
perfect example of “straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel” (Matthew
23:24). That expression, used by Jesus to describe the conduct of the scribes
and Pharisees, made reference to the custom of some Jews of putting cloth over
the mouth of a vessel containing drink to prevent gnats from falling into the
vessel and defiling the liquid. The scribes and Pharisees were totally
concerned about the smallest matters of defilement at the same time that they
were willing to ignore much more obvious causes of defilement, i.e., “swallow
a camel.” The camel was the largest unclean animal known to the region.
The chief priests and elders had just condemned an innocent man and arranged
for His death in a parade of unrighteous travesties, but their “piety” would
not allow them to mingle “blood money” with the rest of the money in the
temple treasury. Apparently they had already “forgotten” that it was they who
had paid the blood money to Judas! In keeping the price of blood out of the
temple treasury, they had carefully strained out the gnat, but only after
having already “swallowed the camel.” We must be careful that we are not
likewise swallowing camels in our daily lives, while ostentatiously straining
out gnats to impress our religious neighbors!
The “Field of Blood” with its graves must have been a stark visual reminder of
the sad end of a privileged disciple. Hopefully we can learn the lessons of
the pieces of silver, even though we cannot physically see the field which
served as a reminder of the consequences of greed.
By Allen Dvorak
From Expository Files 18.2; February 2011